奥赛利定联合环泊酚在胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果及对呼吸功能的影响和安全性评价
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1四川友谊医院 麻醉科,四川 成都 610000;2四川友谊医院 消化内科,四川 成都 610000;3中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 麻醉科,江苏 南京 210000

作者简介:

通讯作者:

吴梦雅,E-mail:467268264@qq.com

中图分类号:

R614.22

基金项目:

四川省卫生健康委员会项目(24QNMP097);中国初级卫生保健基金会医学专项课题(YYWX202410020CD);恩享精准麻醉与疼痛治疗及重症医学研究项目(J202402E055-09);白求恩公益基金会资助项目(J202402E055-09)


Anesthetic efficacy, effects on respiratory function, and safety evaluation of oliceridine combined with ciprofol in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy
Author:
Affiliation:

1Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China;2Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan Friendship Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China;3Department of Anesthesiology, Eastern Theater Command General Hospital of the People's Liberation Army, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210000, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨奥赛利定联合环泊酚在胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果及对呼吸功能的影响和安全性评价。方法 选取2025年4月—2025年9月四川友谊医院行无痛胃肠镜检查的120例患者,随机分为对照组与观察组,各60例。观察组使用环泊酚0.4 mg/kg联合奥赛利定0.02 mg/kg麻醉方案,对照组使用环泊酚0.4 mg/kg联合舒芬太尼0.1 μg/kg麻醉方案,比较两组麻醉效果(起效时间、苏醒时间、离室时间)、麻醉前(T1)、胃镜通过咽部(T2)、肠镜通过肛门(T3)、肠镜通过肝曲(T4)、检查结束(T5)的血流动力学[平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)]、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、不良反应发生情况(呛咳、体动反应、呼吸抑制、恶心呕吐、注射痛等)。结果 观察组苏醒时间、离室时间均短于对照组(P <0.05)。观察组与对照组T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时MAP、HR血流动力学指标比较,结果 ①不同时间点MAP、HR比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);②两组MAP、HR比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05);③两组MAP、HR变化趋势比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组与对照组T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时SpO2比较,结果 ①不同时间点SpO2比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);②观察组与对照组SpO2比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);③两组SpO2变化趋势比较,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组注射痛、恶心呕吐率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P >0.05)。观察组呛咳、体动反应和呼吸抑制率均低于对照组(P <0.05)。结论 奥赛利定联合环泊酚用于无痛胃肠镜麻醉可加快苏醒与离室,血流动力学稳定,呼吸抑制作用弱,恶心呕吐反应轻,安全有效。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the anesthetic efficacy, effects on respiratory function, and safety evaluation of oliceridine combined with ciprofol in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in Sichuan Friendship Hospital from April 2025 to September 2025 were included and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group, with 60 patients in each group. The control group received a combination of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) and sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg), while the observation group received a combination of ciprofol (0.4 mg/kg) and oliceridine (0.02 mg/kg). The anesthetic effects (onset time, recovery time, and time to discharge from the endoscopy unit), hemodynamic parameters [mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) ] and oxygen saturation (SpO2) before sedation (T1), during passage of the gastroscope through the pharynx (T2), during passage of the colonoscope through the anus (T3), during passage of the colonoscope through the hepatic flexure (T4), and at the end of the examination (T5), and adverse reactions (including coughing, body movement responses, respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, injection pain, etc.) were compared between the two groups.Results The recovery time and time to discharge from the endoscopy unit were shorter in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05). Comparisons of MAP and HR between the observation and control groups at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 showed that significant differences were observed in MAP and HR among different time points (P < 0.05) and between the two groups (P < 0.05), and that significant differences were observed in the trends of MAP and HR changes between the two groups (P < 0.05). Comparisons of SpO2 between the two groups at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 showed that significant differences were observed in SpO2 among different time points (P < 0.05) and between the observation and control groups (P < 0.05), and that significant differences were observed in the trends of SpO2 changes between the two groups (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between the two groups in the incidence of injection pain or nausea and vomiting (P > 0.05). The incidences of coughing, body movement responses, and respiratory depression were lower in the observation group than in the control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion Oliceridine combined with ciprofol for painless gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation can accelerate recovery and discharge, maintain hemodynamic stability, reduce respiratory depression, and decrease nausea and vomiting reactions, demonstrating favorable efficacy and safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马玉凤,戢洪丽,周小芳,孙娟,张莉,郁昊,吴梦雅.奥赛利定联合环泊酚在胃肠镜检查中的麻醉效果及对呼吸功能的影响和安全性评价[J].中国现代医学杂志,2026,36(16):57-62

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-06
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关于《中国现代医学杂志》投审稿系统升级的通知
关闭