腹腔镜髂耻韧带悬吊术与传统阴式子宫切除+阴道前后壁修补术的疗效比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

泰州市人民医院 妇产科

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

江苏省自然科学基金(BK20201220)


Comparison of the efficacy of laparoscopic iliopectineal ligament suspension with traditional vaginal hysterectomy plus anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 比较腹腔镜髂耻韧带悬吊术与传统阴式子宫切除+阴道前后壁修补术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的疗效。方法 选取医院2020年2月~2021年10月就诊的POP患者82例,以随机数字表法将其分成研究组(n=41)与对照组(n=41)。对照组接受传统阴式子宫切除+阴道前后壁修补术治疗,研究组接受腹腔镜髂耻韧带悬吊术+阴道前后壁修补术治疗。2组均于术后6个月评估效果。对比2组手术相关指标、盆底功能解剖学参数、盆底功能、性生活质量及并发症,术后12个月,记录2组客观治愈率与复发率。结果 研究组术中出血量比对照组低(P<0.05),研究组术后阴道长度比对照组长(P<0.05),研究组术后住院时间、手术时间比对照组短(P<0.05)。研究组手术前后的阴道前壁脱出距离处女膜最远处(Ba)、阴道后壁脱出距离处女膜最远处(Bp)、阴道前壁中线距处女膜3cm处(Aa)、子宫切除或宫颈最远端切除后阴道残端(C)、阴道后壁中线距处女膜3cm处(Ap)差值低于对照组(均P<0.05)。研究组手术前后盆底功能障碍影响问卷(PFDI-20)评分、盆底疾病生活质量影响问卷短表(PFIQ-7)评分差值高于对照组(均P<0.05)。研究组手术前后盆腔脏器脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷(PISQ)评分、女性性功能评分量表(FSFI)评分差值比对照组高(均P<0.05)。研究组并发症总发生率比对照组低(P<0.05)。研究组客观治愈率高于对照组(P<0.05),研究组复发率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 与阴道前后壁修补术+传统阴式子宫切除术相比,阴道前后壁修补术+腹腔镜髂耻韧带悬吊术可缩短POP患者住院时间与手术时间,疗效确切,减少手术创伤,增加阴道长度,改善性生活质量、盆底功能及解剖学参数,减少复发风险,且安全性良好。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic iliopectineal ligament suspension with traditional vaginal hysterectomy plus anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair. Methods A total of 82 patients with POP who received treatment in the hospital from February 2020 to October 2021 were selected and divided into study group (n=41) and control group (n=41) by random number table method.The control group received traditional vaginal hysterectomy plus anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair, while the study group received laparoscopic iliopectineal ligament suspension plus anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair. Both groups were evaluated 6 months after operation. The surgical indicators, pelvic floor functional anatomic parameters, pelvic floor function, sexual life quality and complications of the two groups were compared. The objective cure rate and recurrence rate of the two groups were recorded 12 months after surgery. Results The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the study group was lower than control group (P<0.05), the postoperative vaginal length in the study group was longer than control group (P< 0.05), and the postoperative hospitalization and operation time in the study group were shorter than control group (P<0.05).In the study group, the difference between anterior vaginal wall protuberance and the farthest distance from hymen (Ba), posterior vaginal wall protuberance and the farthest distance from hymen (Bp), the median line of anterior vaginal wall and 3cm from hymen (Aa), the stump of vagina after hysterectomy or the farthest end of cervix resection (C), and the median line of posterior vaginal wall and 3cm from hymen (Ap) before and after surgery was lower than control group (all P<0.05). The difference of pelvic floor distress inventory-20(PFDI-20)scores and pelvic floor impact questionnaire-short form 7(PFIQ-7)scores before and after surgery in the study group was higher than that in the control group (all P<0.05). The difference of pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence questionnaire (PISQ) score and female sexual function index(FSFI) score before and after operation in the study group was higher than that in the control group (all P<0.05). The total complication rate of study group was lower than control group (P<0.05).The objective cure rate of the study group was higher than control group (P<0.05), and the recurrence rate of the study group was lower than control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair plus traditional vaginal hysterectomy, anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair plus laparoscopic iliopectineal ligament suspension can shorten the hospital stay and operation time of POP patients, with accurate efficacy, reduce surgical trauma, increase vaginal length, improve sexual life quality, pelvic floor function and anatomical parameters, reduce the risk of recurrence, and have good safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-30
  • 最后修改日期:2023-09-18
  • 录用日期:2023-09-18
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期: